BRUSSELS — Belgium’s Foreign and European Affairs Minister, Maxime Prévot, argues that the European Union must adopt a robust stance against U.S. President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies. He emphasizes the need for a decisive reaction, stating that the EU should retaliate with equal force regarding trade disputes.
Prévot articulated this viewpoint in a recent conversation, highlighting that Trump’s disparaging comments about the EU, coupled with punitive measures from Washington, necessitate a vigorous EU response. He believes that the bloc’s market of 450 million people deserves better treatment than what has been offered thus far by the Trump administration.
Strengthening EU’s Trade Position
As a prominent figure in Belgium’s newly formed center-right government, Prévot calls for the EU to explore all possible avenues in its trade strategy, including targeting sensitive sectors within the U.S. economy. He noted, “We know that, among the sectors likely to bring the greatest sensitivity and responsiveness [from the U.S.], there is the whole digital component. And so personally, I’m more in favor of also using this lever as part of the battery of counter-fire measures.” This approach underscores the importance of the tech industry in the ongoing trade conflict.
The EU’s regulatory landscape has found itself entangled in the tariff war, especially with Trump’s threats to retaliate against European regulations governing digital content and competition. Notably, the social media platform X, associated with Elon Musk, has faced scrutiny for alleged violations of EU social media regulations.
Prévot also mentioned the potential activation of the EU’s anti-coercion tool, created in response to challenges posed during Trump’s first term. This mechanism allows the bloc to enact broad retaliatory measures against trade discrimination, including tariffs and investment restrictions. He warns that “this war, particularly on tariffs, is like a boomerang being thrown,” suggesting that those who initiate such conflicts often overlook the repercussions they will face.
Challenges to EU Unity
Amidst these discussions, rifts have begun to emerge within the EU regarding a unified response to Trump’s trade policies. The European Commission has faced criticism from member states like France, Germany, Ireland, and Italy, prompting it to expand consultations prior to imposing tariffs on €18 billion worth of U.S. exports, escalating tensions with the U.S.
Prévot criticized Trump’s preference for bilateral dialogue, stating, “The vision Donald Trump is pursuing is eminently bilateral.” This approach contrasts sharply with the EU’s multilateral stance, as reflected in the roles of figures like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, who have yet to secure significant engagement with the U.S. administration.
Belgium, under its new government, is also grappling with the implications of Trump’s isolationist policies. As part of a renewed commitment to NATO, Belgium aims to meet the alliance’s target military spending of 2% of GDP by 2029. However, this goal appears increasingly ambitious, prompting discussions about potential increases in defense spending.
The Belgian government’s commitment to enhancing its military capabilities will soon be tested as it deliberates the procurement of new fighter jets. Despite previously signing a contract for over 30 U.S.-made F-35s, concerns have arisen regarding overreliance on American military technology and its potential limitations.
Prévot acknowledges the challenges posed by Belgium’s size in maintaining a diverse fleet of fighter jets but remains open to exploring European alternatives. He asserts, “I believe that everyone should now be in favor [of buying European].” However, he also recognizes the practical challenges of transitioning to a more European-focused defense industry, highlighting the need for time and resources to develop new production capabilities.
As the EU navigates these complex trade relationships and defense considerations, the call for a cohesive and assertive strategy remains critical.