Brussels Reporter
  • Home
  • Brussels
  • Europe
    • Europe

      Ukraine war: The top developments you need to…

      August 9, 2022August 10, 2022

      Europe

      Kenya votes in close presidential election where turnout…

      August 9, 2022August 9, 2022

      Europe

      Ukraine war: Kharkiv ‘advance’, 80,000 Russian casualties claim…

      August 9, 2022August 9, 2022

      Europe

      When to fist bump an autocrat

      August 9, 2022

      Europe

      Ryan Giggs: Former Wales boss and Manchester United…

      August 8, 2022August 9, 2022

  • Globe
  • Lifestyle
  • Business

Brussels Reporter

  • Home
  • Brussels
  • Europe
    • Europe

      Ukraine war: The top developments you need to…

      August 9, 2022August 10, 2022

      Europe

      Kenya votes in close presidential election where turnout…

      August 9, 2022August 9, 2022

      Europe

      Ukraine war: Kharkiv ‘advance’, 80,000 Russian casualties claim…

      August 9, 2022August 9, 2022

      Europe

      When to fist bump an autocrat

      August 9, 2022

      Europe

      Ryan Giggs: Former Wales boss and Manchester United…

      August 8, 2022August 9, 2022

  • Globe
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
Home Europe US Supreme Court’s emmissions ruling ‘setback’ to fight against climate change
Europe

US Supreme Court’s emmissions ruling ‘setback’ to fight against climate change

by editor July 1, 2022July 1, 2022
July 1, 2022July 1, 2022

The US Supreme Court has limited how the country’s main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, striking a blow to the fight against climate change.

Conservative judges won a vote by 6-3 on Thursday, leading the court to rule that the Clean Air Act doesn’t empower the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.

Critics including environmental advocates and liberal judges have blasted the decision as a major step in the wrong direction amid dire warnings about the future as a result of climate change. 

University of Georgia meteorology professor Marshall Shepherd, a past president of the American Meteorological Society, said the decision “feels like a gut punch to critical efforts to combat the climate crisis which has the potential to place lives at risk for decades to come.”

The ruling could complicate the US administration’s plans to combat climate change, with its detailed proposal to regulate power plant emissions expected by the end of the year. 

President Joe Biden is aiming to cut the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions by half by the end of the decade and to have an emissions-free power sector by 2035. Power plants account for roughly 30% of carbon dioxide output.

Although Thursday’s decision is specific to the EPA, it falls in line with the conservative majority’s scepticism of the power of regulatory agencies and sends a message on possible future effects beyond climate change and air pollution.

The decision also follows a series of heavily controversial rulings by the Supreme Court. Its conservative majority, bolstered by three appointees of former President Donald Trump, recently overturned the US’ nearly 50-year-old nationwide right to abortion, expanded gun rights and issued major religious rights rulings.

In his opinion for the court issued on Thursday, Chief Justice John Roberts said: “Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day’”.

But he added that the Clean Air Act doesn’t give EPA the authority to do so and that Congress must speak clearly on this subject.

“A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,” he wrote.

In a dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the decision strips the EPA of the power Congress gave it to respond to “the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.”

She said the stakes in the case are high, adding that the court “appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening.”

Biden called the ruling “another devastating decision that aims to take our country backwards.” He said he would “not relent in using my lawful authorities to protect public health and tackle the climate crisis.”

And EPA head Michael Regan said his agency will move forward with a rule to impose environmental standards on the energy sector.

United Nations spokesman Stephane Dujarric also weighed in to call the decision “a setback in our fight against climate change, when we are already far off-track in meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement,” – the international climate accord that the US left during the Trump administration and re-entered once Biden took office.

Source link

previous post
Missing Cryptoqueen: FBI adds Ruja Ignatova to top ten most wanted
next post
VIDEO : Latest news bulletin | July 1st – Midday

Related Posts

Volunteers distribute food in Maryland as pandemic creates...

December 12, 2020

Charles Michel mounts fierce defense of EU vaccine...

March 9, 2021

Northern Ireland: UK plans to end prosecutions for...

July 14, 2021

The bizarre Soviet movie that predicted Putinism

August 6, 2022

Israel police beat pallbearers at Al Jazeera journalists’s...

May 13, 2022

EMA begins review of Pfizer COVID jab for...

May 4, 2021

UK calls urgent G7 health ministers’ meeting to...

November 28, 2021

Poland’s Law and Justice lose majority in parliament...

June 25, 2021

VIDEO : ‘It’s too f***** windy, mate!’ Dover’s...

June 3, 2022

Injured young whale rescued near Athens found dead...

February 3, 2022
Promotion Image

Recent Posts

  • Cuban fuel depot fire spreads to third tank
  • Ukraine war: The top developments you need to know for Tuesday
  • Donald Trump says FBI agents raided his Mar-a-Lago Florida home
  • Kenya votes in close presidential election where turnout could be key
  • Issey Miyake: Japanese fashion designer dies aged 84
Promotion Image

GO!

Lifestyle

  • Scientists are using satellites to count elephants from space for the first time

  • France: Hospital workers demand more resources to fight COVID-19

  • Alexei Navalny: Millions watch jailed critic's 'Putin palace' film

  • Covid vaccine: WHO warns of ‘catastrophic moral failure’

  • Belgium looks good in white

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Kurt Westergaard, Danish cartoonist behind Muhammad cartoon, dies at 86

    July 19, 2021
  • 2

    Netherlands, Belgium supplant Spain as main gateways into Europe for cocaine

    September 7, 2021
  • 3

    9/11 anniversary: Biden calls for unity as US prepares to mark attacks

    September 11, 2021

Editor’s Choices

  • Sociopath ING or a blockchain of corruption from a well-known financial group

    May 24, 2021
  • Pfizer, AstraZeneca COVID jabs ‘highly effective’ against India variant, study shows

    May 23, 2021
  • G20 leaders at Rome summit pledge more vaccines for poorer countries

    May 21, 2021

Opinions

  • When to fist bump an autocrat

    August 9, 2022
  • Anger and anxiety stalk EU’s monkeypox vaccine lottery

    August 8, 2022
  • Turkey: Difficult to live with, nearly impossible to live without

    August 8, 2022

@2018-2021 - Brussels Reporter (www.brusselsreporter.com). All Right Reserved.