In a significant escalation of tensions in the region, Iran’s parliament has reportedly approved a resolution aimed at closing the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime passage for global oil shipments. This move follows recent airstrikes conducted by the United States targeting Iranian nuclear facilities.
Legislative action and its implications
The endorsement from Iran’s legislature, according to state media, signals a unified stance on the issue, although the ultimate decision will be made by the Supreme National Security Council and Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Strait of Hormuz is not only a vital channel for oil transit from Persian Gulf countries but also serves as a strategic gateway connecting the Persian Gulf to international waters.
Approximately 30 percent of the world’s seaborne oil passes through this narrow strait, making it a focal point of international maritime trade. The potential closure of such a critical chokepoint raises alarms about global oil supply and security, especially amid the backdrop of escalating regional hostilities.
US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites
The parliamentary action followed the U.S. military’s operation known as Midnight Hammer, which involved targeted strikes against key Iranian nuclear sites, including facilities in Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth characterized the airstrikes as a necessary step to “neutralize” Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
“These attacks are a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” said President Donald Trump during a national address.
The geopolitical ramifications of this situation are profound, as the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz could have significant implications for global energy markets, international trade, and regional stability. Observers are closely monitoring developments as both nations navigate this increasingly volatile landscape.