The latest session of Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) proved to be a lively, albeit chaotic, spectacle, showcasing the intense dynamics of British politics. This week’s debate centered around crucial issues such as immigration and asylum, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Tory Leader Kemi Badenoch exchanging pointed remarks.
Immigration and the court ruling
A report from the Daily Telegraph regarding a court’s decision to permit Palestinian migrants to reside in the UK under the Homes for Ukraine scheme provided Badenoch with an opportunity to challenge Starmer directly. However, in her attempt to scrutinize Starmer on this matter, she inadvertently fell into traps that had been set by the Prime Minister. Badenoch criticized the judge’s ruling against the Home Office on human rights grounds, labeling it as “completely wrong.” She pressed Starmer on whether the government would appeal this ruling, seemingly forgetting that the family’s application was submitted in January 2024, during her party’s governance.
In an unexpected twist, Starmer acknowledged Badenoch’s point, stating, “She hasn’t quite done her homework because the decision in question was taken under the last government.” He also mentioned that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is considering ways to close the “legal loophole” that enabled the ruling, although he refrained from clearly stating whether the government plans to challenge the court’s decision.
Contentious exchanges on borders and appointments
The debate heated up as Badenoch asserted, “We cannot be in a situation where we allow enormous numbers of people to exploit our laws in this way.” Starmer countered by claiming that Badenoch’s party had “lost control of immigration,” thus avoiding any substantial progress in the discussion.
Furthermore, Badenoch seized the opportunity to criticize Attorney General Richard Hermer, questioning his allegiance to the Conservative principles. She called for appointments of individuals who genuinely believe in the country’s values, implying a lack of faith in Hermer, a seasoned human rights lawyer. Badenoch also raised concerns about Britain’s incoming borders inspector, who had previously stated he was based in Finland, hinting at issues regarding remote work.
Starmer provided a decisive rebuttal, noting that the inspector was appointed in 2019 by the previous administration and had been working from Finland for five years. He emphasized that changes had been made to ensure this individual would now serve full-time in the UK, effectively addressing Badenoch’s criticisms.
In a notable moment, Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, addressed potential retaliatory tariffs against electric cars in light of President Trump’s recently imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum. Starmer reiterated the importance of maintaining a strong US-UK relationship while prioritizing Britain’s interests.
In a surprising intervention, Labour MP Imran Hussain remarked on the government’s Employment Rights Bill, chastising opposition parties for their lack of support. Starmer surprisingly concurred, suggesting that Badenoch should advocate for protections against immediate firings in the workplace.
In terms of performance ratings for the session, Badenoch scored a 5 out of 10 while Starmer received a 7 out of 10. Although Badenoch attempted to tackle critical issues that resonate with voters, Starmer’s effective comebacks and clear articulation of points allowed him to maintain an edge throughout the exchanges.