Brussels Reporter
  • Home
  • Brussels
  • Europe
    • Europe

      ‘Outrage’: Row after pro-Brexit group moves its website…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      UK ends quarantine-free travel in fight against new…

      January 15, 2021

      Europe

      Switss to vote in referendum on government’s COVID-19…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      UK bans arrivals from South America and Portugal…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      Slovenia resumes funding for national press agency after…

      January 14, 2021January 14, 2021

  • Globe
  • Lifestyle
  • Business

Brussels Reporter

  • Home
  • Brussels
  • Europe
    • Europe

      ‘Outrage’: Row after pro-Brexit group moves its website…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      UK ends quarantine-free travel in fight against new…

      January 15, 2021

      Europe

      Switss to vote in referendum on government’s COVID-19…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      UK bans arrivals from South America and Portugal…

      January 15, 2021January 15, 2021

      Europe

      Slovenia resumes funding for national press agency after…

      January 14, 2021January 14, 2021

  • Globe
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
Home Europe Japan’s handling of Carlos Ghosn was wrong, say rights experts
Europe

Japan’s handling of Carlos Ghosn was wrong, say rights experts

by editor November 24, 2020November 24, 2020
November 24, 2020November 24, 2020

A panel of human rights experts working with the United Nations said Monday that former Renault-Nissan boss Carlos Ghosn was wrongly detained in Japan and has urged “compensation” for him from the Japanese government.

The Japanese government denounced the report as a “totally unacceptable” viewpoint that will change nothing in the country”s legal process.

In its opinion published Monday, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that Ghosn’s arrest in Japan in late 2018 and early 2019 was “arbitrary” and called on Japan’s government to “take the necessary steps to remedy the situation of Mr Ghosn without delay.” A determination of whether detention is arbitrary is based on various criteria, including international norms of justice.

While Ghosn is no longer in Japan, having fled in a dramatic operation that drew headlines worldwide, the opinion could weigh on minds in courtrooms in the country and beyond. It could affect, for example, the possible extradition of two Americans, Michael Taylor and his son Peter, whom Japanese prosecutors say helped the executive sneak out of Japan.

‘Take appropriate measures’

Ghosn, a 66-year-old with French, Lebanese and Brazilian citizenship, led Japanese automaker Nissan for two decades, rescuing it from near-bankruptcy. He was arrested in November 2018 on charges of breach of trust, in misusing company assets for personal gain, and violating securities laws in not fully disclosing his compensation. He denies wrongdoing.

In December, he fled Japan to Lebanon while out on bail awaiting trial, meaning his case will not go on in Japan. Interpol has issued a wanted notice but his extradition from Lebanon is unlikely.

The five-member working group, which is made up of independent experts, called on Japan to ensure a “full and independent investigation” of Ghosn’s detention, and asked the government “to take appropriate measures against those responsible for the violation of his rights.”

The working group said that “the appropriate remedy would be to accord Mr Ghosn an enforceable right to compensation and other reparations.”

The opinions of the working group are not binding on countries but aim to hold them up to their own human rights commitments. Among its past rulings involved the case of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, who was likewise deemed to have had his human rights violated.

The panel, which is independent from the United Nations, noted a string of allegations from Ghosn and his representatives, such as that he was subjected to solitary confinement and long interrogations at day or night, and denied access to court pleadings. His team claimed that interrogations of Ghosn were aimed to extract a confession.

‘Opinion is totally unacceptable’

Japan’s system has been repeatedly criticised by human rights advocates. The panel cited previous concerns about Japan’s so-called “daiyo kangoku” system of detention and interrogation that relies heavily on confessions and could expose detainees to torture, ill-treatment and coercion.

Japan’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the government had applied “appropriate procedures” in the case, and it could not provide full information to the working group before a trial had begun. For that reason, the ministry added, it would be inappropriate for the working group to make a decision on the Ghosn case “based on limited information and biased allegations” from him and his team.

“The opinion is totally unacceptable, and is not legally binding,” the ministry statement said. It also warned that the opinion could set a dangerous precedent, and “encourage those who would stand criminal trial to entertain the idea that flight can be justified and prevent the realisation of justice and the proper functioning of the criminal justice system in each country.”

“Japan can by no means accept the opinion of the Working Group regarding the case of the defendant Carlos Ghosn,” it added.

‘Happy’ and ‘relieved’

Ghosn lawyer Jessica Finelle welcomed the “brave” decision by the panel and said its members had been “hard on the Japanese legal system” and the way that Japanese authorities treated Mr Ghosn, “specifically, violating numerous times his presumption of innocence, presenting him as guilty, orchestrating two of his arrests with the media…”

Ghosn was “very happy” and “relieved” about the opinion, she said.

“He is somehow is getting back his dignity because he’s been humiliated during this time that he was held in Japan,” she said.

Ghosn has accused Nissan and Japanese officials of conspiring to bring him down to block a fuller integration of Nissan with its French alliance partner Renault SA of France.

Ghosn’s lawyers filed a petition with the working group in March last year, appealing to its role to look into cases in which governments are alleged to have wrongly detained individuals under agreed international human rights conventions.

Its members declined to speak to reporters about the opinion, the UN human rights office said.

Source link

previous post
David Dinkins: New York City's first black mayor dies
next post
Jamal Khashoggi murder: Trial of 20 Saudis in absentia resumes in Turkey

Related Posts

Naomi Osaka comes back, beats Azarenka for 2nd...

September 13, 2020

Frontex sends reinforcements to Greece amid migrant crisis

March 1, 2020

South African coronavirus variant: What we know so...

January 4, 2021

How Christmas is ruining the planet

December 26, 2019

Flavio Briatore: “I was the one of the...

August 28, 2020

World’s cartoonists on this week’s events

January 11, 2020

Hitler’s handwritten speech notes sold at auction ‘above...

October 23, 2020

Council and Parliament reach deal on EU budget

November 10, 2020

Poland presidential election: Duda heading for run-off against...

June 28, 2020

Trump says his lawyer Rudy Giuliani has tested...

December 6, 2020
Promotion Image

Recent Posts

  • ‘Outrage’: Row after pro-Brexit group moves its website back into EU
  • Coronavirus: EU anger over reduced Pfizer vaccine deliveries
  • UK ends quarantine-free travel in fight against new coronavirus variants
  • Switss to vote in referendum on government’s COVID-19 measures
  • Dutch Rutte government resigns over child welfare fraud scandal
Promotion Image

GO!

Instagram

No images found!
Try some other hashtag or username

Lifestyle

  • Keeping the country in Europe cost Syriza power

  • The populist surge that did not happen

  • Can Europe avoid the coming crisis?

  • Green country went even greener

  • The Social democrats’ comeback

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Beware of scammING. Dirty money of famous bank

    October 6, 2020
  • 2

    Angela Merkel: The Caryatid | VoxEurop.eu: European news, cartoons and press reviews

    January 21, 2019
  • 3

    Switss to vote in referendum on government’s COVID-19 measures

    January 15, 2021

Editor’s Choices

  • Can Europe avoid the coming crisis?

    August 26, 2019
  • Avoiding a repeat performance of the financial crisis

    July 14, 2019
  • The EU’s next big challenge

    June 11, 2019

Opinions

  • Keeping the country in Europe cost Syriza power

    August 28, 2019
  • The populist surge that did not happen

    August 27, 2019
  • Can Europe avoid the coming crisis?

    August 26, 2019

@2018-2020 - Brussels Reporter (www.brusselsreporter.com). All Right Reserved.